The Ritz-Carlton, Toronto
One hundred and fifty-nine condominiums on the top thirty floors. The architect states the floors; nobody on the operator's or the developer's side states the name.
The figures come from Kohn Pedersen Fox and nowhere else. The practice's project page gives 159 condominiums and says “The top 30 floors of the tower comprise 360,000 square feet of condominiums,” with Graywood Developments as client. That is a first-party professional source for the building and the unit count, and the register takes it.
What it is not is a source for the marque on the residences. No Ritz-Carlton page and no Graywood page naming the residences was reached; the residential name in general use — The Residences of The Ritz-Carlton, Toronto — is carried here as an alias and not as the official name, because the register could not find the party entitled to publish it doing so. The brand status is recorded as unverified. The operator's residences index is no help in either direction: it lists projects currently selling, so a building whose units have all been sold would be absent from it whether the relationship exists or not. Absence from a sales page disproves nothing, and the register does not treat it as evidence.
Completion year, tenure and bedrooms are not established, and the architect's page is internally inconsistent on the hotel. It gives the hotel keys as 257 in one place and 240 in another. A page that disagrees with itself about the hotel is still the best source available for the condominiums, which is a thing worth saying out loud on the card rather than quietly relying on.
Who it is not for
Not for a buyer who wants the brand relationship confirmed by the brand: on present evidence it rests on the architect and the resale market. Not for a non-Canadian buyer before 1 January 2027.
Sources
- kpf.com (the architect's project page: 159 condominiums; ‘The top 30 floors of the tower comprise 360,000 square feet of condominiums’; client Graywood Developments; hotel keys given as 257 in one place and 240 in another — https://www.kpf.com/project/the-ritz-carlton-toronto
- cmhc-schl.gc.ca (the purchase prohibition — https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/professionals/housing-markets-data-and-research/housing-research/consultations/prohibition-purchase-residential-property-non-canadians-act/faq)
Pages read are linked.
Verification
- Official source
- Checked
- Inventory
- From official source
- Property confirmation
- Pending
- Last verified
- —
Booking
Private Residences records addresses; it does not broker them. Enquiries are passed to the party named in the record, and nothing on this site is an offer.
Make an enquiryClassified by The Resort Collection House · Edition 2026 · PR-D-474
In the journal
13.10.2026 · Canada's two index cities, and a marque found missing from under three hundred estates
And the two cities are shaped differently, which the records now show. Toronto's case is made by five hotel marques — Four Seasons, St. Regis, Ritz-Carlton, Shangri-La, Nobu — and Nobu's 658 units are larger than the other four combined. Vancouver's is made by architects: four of its six records carry no marque, and two of those put a practice's name where the marque would sit. Behind all thirteen stands one sentence from the Department of Finance: the ban on purchases by non-Canadians, condominium units named expressly, runs to 1 January 2027.
Investment migration — the facts the rule turns on
The rule for Canada: No property route — and a purchase ban to 2027 — checked 24.09.2026.
| Entry price | Not established | 13.10.2026 · searched in the record's sources; not published |
The register publishes the facts and the rule; it does not say whether any purchase qualifies. Eligibility attaches to a sale, not to a building, and the register is not immigration counsel.